Head-to-head · Research-based

Supermaven vs Tabnine (2026)

The completion-tool showdown: Supermaven, the speed-obsessed plugin famous for near-instant suggestions, against Tabnine, the veteran that sells privacy and compliance as its headline feature. Both live inside your existing editor — neither asks you to switch.

They optimize for different things. Supermaven bets that latency is the whole game; Tabnine bets that enterprises will pay for on-premise deployment and strict data controls. This page compares them on price, privacy, and editor support using documented features and current pricing.

SupermavenTabnine
Pro price$10/mo$12/user/mo
Free tierGenerous — fast completions with no time limitBasic short completions
Core strengthSpeed — famously fast suggestions, ~1M-token context windowPrivacy — zero-retention options and on-premise deployment
Self-hosting / on-premNo on-premise optionYes — self-hosted and air-gapped deployment (Enterprise)
Editor supportVS Code, JetBrains, NeovimVS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Visual Studio, Eclipse, and more
Training-data policyStandard cloud termsIP-safe training; private code never trains public models
Team controlsTeam plan with centralized billingSSO, policy controls, admin console (Enterprise)
Best forDevelopers who want the fastest autocomplete in their current editorRegulated industries and compliance-heavy teams

Who should pick which

  • Supermaven — You want the fastest inline completions and a generous free tier, and you work in VS Code, JetBrains, or Neovim
  • Tabnine — Your company requires on-premise deployment, zero data retention, or contractual IP-safety guarantees

The contenders

Supermaven

The fastest AI code completion, with a 1M-token context.

★★★★☆8.1/10

Free tier available; Pro from $10/mo

Try Supermaven →

Tabnine

Private, secure AI code completion for teams.

★★★★☆7.5/10

Free tier available; Pro from $12/mo

Try Tabnine →

Our verdict

Pick Supermaven if raw completion speed is what you feel every day — it is cheaper, faster, and its free tier is good enough for many developers. Pick Tabnine if compliance decides for you: on-premise deployment and strict data controls are things Supermaven simply does not offer. For everyone else, speed wins.

FAQ

What happened to Supermaven as a company?

Supermaven was acquired by Cursor, and its completion technology now also powers Cursor's Tab feature. The standalone Supermaven plugin remains available for VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim.

Which is better for enterprise compliance?

Tabnine, by a wide margin. Self-hosted and air-gapped deployment, zero-retention options, and IP-safe training are built for regulated industries. Supermaven has no on-premise offering.

Can I run either alongside Cursor or Claude Code?

Yes. Both are lightweight editor plugins, and many developers pair a fast completer like Supermaven with an agentic tool for heavier work. Check your team's policy on code-assistant tooling first.

📡 Comparison compiled from official documentation, pricing pages, and public user feedback. Prices change fast — confirm on the official site before buying.